Wall Papers
News Feed
Blogs
Event Photos
Screen Shots
Polls
Popular Content
Get GNU / Linux
Members
SearchSubmitted by ADminS on Tue, 08/11/2005 - 16:24.
3ayzeen ne3mel votes tany for cancelling that "aup in IRC " .
- ADminS's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 402 reads
|
Submitted by ADminS on Tue, 08/11/2005 - 16:24.
3ayzeen ne3mel votes tany for cancelling that "aup in IRC " .
|
User loginNavigationActive forum topicsUpcoming eventsPollWould you like to change the current eglug theme to be the one proposed in http://eglug.org/node/3180? sure, the proposed theme looks great. 61% not really, I'm compfortable with the current theme. 12% I do want to change, but can we choose another theme? I don't like the proposed one. 27% Total votes: 33
NewsForgeLinux Counter Egypt StatisticsWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 4 guests online.
|
Respect your peers
The community voted a very short time ago to apply the AUP on the IRC channel. In other words, very recently the will of the community was to do the opposite of what you're suggesting here.
You've made it very clear that you don't agree, and the nature of IRC provides you with a way to get what you want; another channel to act uncivilized in.
Calling for a vote like this is frankly childish.
In case my position isn't clear, consider this a summary of my reaction: OVER MY DEAD BODY.
-- Panem et *burp* circenses
/me trolling.
Youssef, Assume that I aggre with you.
But saying "over my dead body"'ll change nothing because if we construct another vote and the result was not to keep the AUP; Both of us can do nothing except not joining the channel!
WWW: The place for organized randoms!
EGLUG Admin..
Arabeyes Core Member.
Free Software Foundation Associate Member.
Can you tell me your reasons
Can you tell me your reasons which you want to cancel AUP for? thank you.
Ahmed Hashim
Hacker from the Earth
aren't two of them enough?!
aren't two of them enough?!
http://www.eglug.org/node/1363
http://www.eglug.org/node/1421
EGLUG IRC Channel is a part of EGLUG community, so what's the point of allowing "unacceptable" (according to two polls) things right there?