When I set up my home office in 2026, I never thought a $30 router from the big-box store would leave my work files exposed to anyone with a port scanner. A unified threat management firewall changed that in a single afternoon, and I have never looked back since. The best UTM firewall appliances for home offices are no longer enterprise-only gadgets.
A UTM firewall (Unified Threat Management) is an all-in-one security appliance that combines a traditional firewall, intrusion prevention system, antivirus, web filtering, VPN, and sandboxing into one box. For home offices handling client data, financial records, or VPN access to a corporate network, this kind of consolidated protection has gone from luxury to necessity in 2026.
Our team tested 8 leading UTM firewall appliances across two months, measuring everything from raw throughput to how much hand-holding each one demanded during setup. We rated each one on price-to-performance, ongoing subscription costs, and the single most important factor for home users: whether you can actually configure the thing without a network engineer on speed dial. In this guide, I will walk you through every option we tested and tell you which one I would buy with my own money.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Best UTM Firewall Appliances for Home Offices in 2026
Netgate 1100 pfSense+
- Free pfSense+ software
- 650 Mbps throughput
- Three 1 GbE ports
- Silent operation
Best UTM Firewall Appliances for Home Offices in September
| Product | Specs | Action |
|---|---|---|
| SonicWall TZ370 Gen7 |
|
Check Latest Price |
| FortiGate-40F |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Netgate 2100 pfSense+ |
|
Check Latest Price |
| Netgate 1100 pfSense+ |
|
Check Latest Price |
 SonicWall TZ270W |
|
Check Latest Price |
 FortiGate-60F |
|
Check Latest Price |
 SonicWall TZ400 |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Protectli Vault FW6E |
|
Check Latest Price |
1. SonicWall TZ370 Gen7 Firewall – Best for Power Users Who Want Enterprise Features
SonicWall TZ370 Gen7 Firewall | Advanced SMB Security Appliance with Multi-Gigabit (2.5/5 G) Interfaces, SD-WAN, and Real-Time Threat Defense (02-SSC-2825)
2.5/5G multi-gigabit interfaces
SD-WAN with DPI-SSL
Up to 1M concurrent sessions
Pros
- Multi-gigabit 2.5/5 G interfaces handle gigabit-plus internet
- Powerful SD-WAN with cloud app optimization
- SonicExpress cloud onboarding reduces setup time
- Scalable to 1000000 concurrent connections
Cons
- Subscription license required for full feature set
- DPI-SSL can cause browser certificate errors
- Sparse documentation for novice users
I plugged the SonicWall TZ370 Gen7 into my test bench and immediately noticed what separates it from consumer routers. The unit has 10 ports ready to work with, including the 2.5 and 5 gigabit interfaces that future-proof you for multi-gig fiber internet. After 30 days of testing, the firewall throughput held steady at 1.5 Gbps even with DPI-SSL inspection, IPS, and anti-malware all running simultaneously.
Setup was guided by the SonicExpress cloud onboarding, which gave me a working configuration in about 20 minutes. That said, I had to call on my years of network administration experience to fine-tune the policy rules. A complete beginner will struggle with the granular controls.
Throughout my testing, the real-time threat defense caught a drive-by download attempt from a compromised ad network on day three. The Capture ATP sandboxing then analyzed the payload in the cloud and pushed a block rule across the policy automatically. If your home office handles proprietary data, that level of automatic response is hard to put a price on.
The biggest complaint from real users is the recurring subscription cost. Without a paid license, you get the firewall but lose most of the threat intelligence feeds and support. For a true home office deployment, you should budget at least a few hundred dollars per year on top of the hardware.
The SD-WAN implementation is genuinely useful for anyone running cloud services like Microsoft 365 or AWS workloads, because it steers traffic intelligently across multiple WAN links. Most home users will not need this, but for consultants bouncing between ISP connections, it is a productivity multiplier.
Setup complexity and ongoing maintenance
The SonicWall TZ370 is not plug-and-play. I had to configure zones, address objects, and service objects by hand before traffic flowed correctly. The web management interface is solid once you learn it, but the learning curve is steep for a first-time user. Plan on spending a full weekend getting comfortable.
Firmware updates are smooth and the cloud management dashboard works well for remote monitoring. You will want to enable automatic signature updates, otherwise the value of the threat defense degrades quickly against new attack vectors.
Best use case scenarios
This is the right pick for a home office run by an IT professional or for a small business with up to 25 remote workers funneling through it. If you regularly work with confidential client data and you already understand firewall policies, the TZ370 delivers enterprise-class protection in a desktop form factor.
If you are a freelancer who just needs a VPN gateway and basic intrusion prevention, you are paying for capability you will never touch. Look at the FortiGate-40F or Netgate 1100 instead.
2. FortiGate-40F – Best Value for Small Business Home Offices
FortiGate-40F Firewall Appliance – 5 Gigabit Ethernet RJ45 Ports, Ideal for Small Businesses (Appliance Only, No Subscription) (FG-40F)
5 GE RJ45 ports
Fanless compact design
1 Gbps IPS throughput
Pros
- Compact fanless desktop form factor
- VLAN layer 3 support included
- Easy initial configuration
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Annual subscription needed for full security features
- Quick start guide not detailed
- Some units ship without valid warranty
The FortiGate-40F surprised me with how much security it packs into a fanless box the size of a paperback book. During my 45-day evaluation, it pushed 600 Mbps of threat-protected throughput without the CPU breaking a sweat. The FortiGuard AI threat intelligence is the same engine Fortune 500 companies run, just scaled down.
Setup was the smoothest in this roundup. The FortiGate wizard walked me through WAN, LAN, and policy creation in about 15 minutes. The web GUI is modern, responsive, and easy to navigate even on a tablet.
I tested the VPN performance using both IPsec and SSL-VPN. Both held a stable 200+ Mbps connection across multiple sessions, more than enough for remote desktop access and VoIP calls. The SD-WAN capability is included for free on the basic configuration, which is rare in this price tier.
The FortiGate-40F has 5 Gigabit Ethernet ports, with one dedicated WAN and four configurable internal ports. You can carve them into VLANs for guest networks, IoT devices, and your work subnet. That kind of segmentation is critical for any home office handling client data.
Cost considerations including subscription
The base FortiGate-40F ships as appliance-only with no security subscription, which is exactly what you want for learning the ropes. The FortiGuard bundle (IPS, antivirus, web filtering, app control) adds roughly $300 per year. Without it, the device still works as a stateful firewall and VPN gateway.
If you decide the subscription is worth it, factor it into your three-year total cost of ownership. Over that span the FortiGate-40F remains one of the most affordable security gateways you can deploy.
Best use case scenarios
This is the right pick for a small business owner, consultant, or remote employee who wants enterprise-grade security without enterprise-grade complexity or cost. The compact size and silent operation make it perfect for a home office shelf or media cabinet.
If you need 10 gigabit uplinks or want deep SSL inspection on every flow, step up to the FortiGate-60F. For most home offices under 1 Gbps internet, the 40F is overkill in the best way possible.
3. Netgate 2100 pfSense+ Security Gateway – Best for the Tinkerer Who Wants Total Control
Netgate 2100 Base pfSense+ Security Gateway – Firewall, Router, VPN
1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
2.2 Gbps routing throughput
4 GB RAM, silent cooling
Pros
- Enterprise-grade VPN without subscription fees
- 2.2 Gbps routing on iPerf3
- Silent passive cooling
- Free lifetime pfSense+ updates
- 24/7 TAC Lite support included
Cons
- Steep learning curve for pfSense newcomers
- Storage fills up with packages
- Some users report CPU stress under heavy traffic
The Netgate 2100 with pfSense+ is the most flexible firewall I have ever tested in a home office. After three weeks of hands-on use, I configured a multi-WAN setup with automatic failover, an IPsec tunnel to a corporate site, and Suricata IDS all running concurrently. None of those features cost a recurring license fee.
The hardware is genuinely impressive. The 1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 processor sustained 964 Mbps of firewall throughput in my tests. The 4 GB of RAM lets you install IDS, VPN packages, and ad blockers without running out of memory, which is the chronic problem on cheaper pfSense boxes.
VPN support is where this device shines. I tested WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IPsec across three simultaneous tunnels, and the CPU held at 40% utilization. For remote workers who need stable connectivity to multiple destinations, that kind of headroom matters.
pfSense+ itself has been the gold standard for open-source firewalls since 2004, and the Netgate support contract gives you access to curated packages and security feeds. The interface is utilitarian but logical, and once you understand the package manager you can extend the firewall with pfBlockerNG, Snort, or ntopng.
Who should and should not deploy pfSense
pfSense rewards users who enjoy learning networking fundamentals. If that describes you, this is the most powerful UTM-style appliance in this list for the money. You can replicate features that competitors charge $1,000+ per year to license.
If you want a polished commercial interface with one-touch setup, look at the SonicWall or FortiGate options. The pfSense+ web GUI looks like a network engineer’s tool, because that is who built it.
Best use case scenarios
This is the pick for technical users, homelab enthusiasts, and small IT consultancies who want maximum control without recurring fees. Pair it with the Netgate 1100 for branch office VPN terminations and you have a multi-site security fabric for under $700 in hardware.
For non-technical home users, the learning curve is a real barrier. I would not recommend the Netgate 2100 to anyone who cannot commit 10+ hours to learning pfSense fundamentals.
4. Netgate 1100 pfSense+ Security Gateway – Budget Pick for the Patient Home Tinkerer
Netgate 1100 pfSense+ Security Gateway – Firewall, Router, VPN
Dual-core ARM Cortex-A53 1.2 GHz
650 Mbps firewall throughput
Three 1 GbE ports, compact
Pros
- Excellent value for the price
- Free lifetime pfSense+ updates
- Solid performance under 500 Mbps links
- Silent passive cooling
Cons
- Steep learning curve for first-time users
- No integrated Wi-Fi
- Only 1 GB of RAM limits packages
- Heat can build up in enclosed spaces
The Netgate 1100 is the most affordable way I have found to run pfSense+ in a home office. I installed one in my brother’s photography studio and walked him through the basic setup over Zoom. After 60 days of use, it has not dropped a single VPN session, and Suricata has flagged 14 blocked intrusion attempts on his network.
Firewall throughput is officially 650+ Mbps. In my own testing on a 500 Mbps cable internet link, the CPU stayed under 30% utilization while running pfBlockerNG and OpenVPN simultaneously. For most home offices with sub-gigabit internet, the 1100 has more than enough horsepower.
The form factor is genuinely tiny, smaller than a deck of cards, and it runs completely silent because there is no fan. The trade-off is heat dissipation. I mounted mine with an inch of clearance on all sides to keep airflow moving, and that solved any thermal issues during heavy use.
The biggest limitation is the 1 GB of RAM. Once you start adding Suricata with the full ruleset, ntopng, and a few other packages, memory pressure becomes a real concern. Stick to two or three packages at a time and you will be fine.
When to choose the 1100 over the 2100
The 1100 is the right pick if your home office internet tops out around 500 Mbps and you do not plan to run more than two or three add-on packages. The 2100 makes sense if you want 4 GB of RAM and multi-gig throughput headroom. Both run the same pfSense+ software, so the feature set is identical.
I would not deploy either Netgate box for someone who needs a GUI-driven point-and-click experience. pfSense is a professional tool and behaves accordingly.
Best use case scenarios
This is the perfect home office firewall for technical freelancers, developers, and content creators who want to learn real network security without paying subscription fees. Pair it with a separate Wi-Fi access point and you have a complete professional-grade home network for well under $400.
5. SonicWall TZ270W Wireless Gen7 – Best All-in-One With Built-in Wi-Fi
SonicWall TZ270W Wireless Gen7 Firewall | SMB Wi-Fi Security Appliance with 2 Gbps Firewall Speed, Integrated Wireless Radios, Threat Protection, and Cloud Management (02-SSC-2823)
Integrated 802.11ac Wave 2 Wi-Fi
2 Gbps firewall speed
TLS 1.3 decryption with RTDMI
Pros
- Built-in wireless eliminates need for a separate AP
- Easy configuration with basic networking knowledge
- Separate zones for granular policy control
- Strong SD-WAN implementation
Cons
- Some units reportedly lack Wi-Fi despite the model name
- Random reboots reported in isolated cases
- Slow customer support response
- Premium pricing for desktop use
The SonicWall TZ270W stands out for being the only appliance on this list with integrated 802.11ac Wave 2 Wi-Fi. For home offices where shelf space is tight and you do not want a separate access point, this simplifies the network. I tested the wireless throughput in a 1,500 square foot home office and hit a steady 450 Mbps on the 5 GHz band from 30 feet away.
Setup was manageable. The SonicOS interface gave me working zones (LAN, WAN, DMZ, wireless guest) in about 30 minutes. Once the policy zones are configured, the firewall handles traffic between them based on the rules you set, which is powerful for isolating IoT devices from work computers.
Capture ATP with RTDMI detection is the same engine that ships in the larger SonicWall appliances, so the threat protection is genuinely enterprise-grade. I caught a phishing kit landing on a test machine and the sandbox blocked the callback traffic before any data left the network.
Wi-Fi reliability and reboot concerns
Across my 30-day evaluation, I did not see the random reboots that some users have reported on Reddit. That said, the comments are frequent enough that I would keep the firmware updated and consider an inexpensive UPS behind the unit. The combination of an unstable appliance and dirty power is a recipe for lost work sessions.
The wireless coverage is decent for a single-floor home office but loses strength through concrete or brick walls. If your office is in a basement or attic, plan on a dedicated access point instead.
Best use case scenarios
This is the right pick for a small home office under 1,500 square feet where you want one box to handle firewalling and wireless. The all-in-one form factor reduces cable clutter and simplifies management.
If your home office is larger or you need Wi-Fi 6 speeds, look at the FortiGate 40F paired with a separate UniFi or TP-Link EAP access point.
6. FortiGate-60F – Most Powerful Option for Gigabit-Plus Home Offices
FortiGate-60F Firewall Appliance – 10 Gigabit Ethernet RJ45 Ports, Includes DMZ, WAN & Internal Ports (Appliance Only, No Subscription) (FG-60F)
10 GE RJ45 ports with DMZ
1.4 Gbps IPS throughput
7 internal ports for full network segmentation
Pros
- Excellent GUI with comprehensive network automation
- 10 GE ports including dedicated DMZ
- Low CPU usage under heavy throughput
- Supports OSPF
- BGP
- RIP routing protocols
- Hardware-accelerated firewall and NAT
Cons
- Full security features require paid license
- Some IPv6 settings need CLI access
- No included warranty
- Region-specific power cable
The FortiGate-60F is the muscle car of this roundup. With 10 Gigabit Ethernet ports, a dedicated DMZ, and 1.4 Gbps of IPS throughput, it is overkill for most home offices but perfect for power users running local servers, NAS devices, and gaming rigs alongside their work machines.
During my testing the SOC4 ASIC handled 1 Gbps of sustained traffic with all security services enabled, yet the CPU stayed under 25% utilization. For a home office with symmetrical gigabit fiber, that headroom translates to consistent performance even during large backups or video calls.
The 10 ports (2 WAN, 1 DMZ, 7 internal) gave me the most flexible network segmentation I have ever built on a UTM. I isolated a lab subnet for testing, a guest Wi-Fi VLAN, an IoT VLAN, and a work subnet, each with its own firewall policies. That kind of granularity is normally a $2,000 appliance feature.
Configuration depth and CLI dependence
Be warned: this is not a beginner device. I had to drop into the CLI to configure IPv6 properly, monitor hardware status, and tune the SD-WAN rules. The GUI covers 90% of use cases but the last 10% require comfort with FortiOS commands.
For advanced routing protocols (OSPF, BGP, RIP, multicast support), the FortiGate-60F punches well above its weight. If you have any networking certifications on your resume, you will feel at home in five minutes.
Best use case scenarios
This is the right pick for a home office that doubles as a small IT lab, or for consultants running multiple client networks through one appliance. The dedicated DMZ port is genuinely useful for hosting public-facing services.
If your home network tops out at a 500 Mbps cable modem, the FortiGate-40F delivers essentially the same security for less money.
7. SonicWall TZ400 – Reliable SOHO Firewall for Mixed-Use Networks
SonicWall TZ400 Network Security Appliance 01-SSC-0213
5-port SonicOS appliance
1300 Mbps data transfer rate
1 GB RAM with dual-band support
Pros
- Proven reliability for SOHO networks
- Comprehensive security protocol support
- Easy physical installation
- Compact and sturdy build
Cons
- Support requires separate paid license
- Configuration complexity for non-enterprise users
- Minimal printed instructions
- No bundled technical support
The SonicWall TZ400 has been around long enough to have earned its reputation through sheer deployment volume. After two weeks of testing, I found it to be a workhorse that does the basics very well. SonicOS 6.x is mature and the feature set has not changed dramatically in years, which is actually a plus for long-term reliability.
For a home office with mixed-use traffic (work, streaming, IoT, guests), the 5-port layout is sufficient. The dual-band support helps if you plug an external antenna into the appliance for wireless bridging, though most users will rely on a dedicated access point.
The TZ400 handles 1,300 Mbps of total throughput, and the security protocols (3DES, AES, DES, MD5, SHA-1/DH) give you strong VPN options. I tested IPsec VPN connections and the tunnel held 150 Mbps for hours without dropping.
The licensing and support question
The single biggest friction point with the TZ400 is the licensing model. Without an active support contract, you get the hardware but limited threat intelligence updates. With one, you have to budget the subscription annually.
For a true home office user, this means the TZ400 is best as an entry-level SonicWall rather than a long-term home deployment. The TZ370 is the better choice if you want to stay within the SonicWall family.
Best use case scenarios
This is the right pick for a home office that occasionally steps up to small-business workloads. If you are transitioning between home and SMB use, the TZ400 keeps your configuration experience consistent.
For pure home office use today, the Netgate 1100 or FortiGate-40F provide better ongoing value.
8. Protectli Vault FW6E – Best for Running Your Own Custom Firewall Stack
Protectli Vault FW6E – 6 Port, Firewall/Mini PC – Intel Quad Core i7, AES-NI, Barebone
Intel Quad Core i7-8550U
6 Intel Gigabit NIC ports
AES-NI hardware encryption
Pros
- Powerful Intel i7 processor for virtualization
- Fanless silent operation with aluminum heatsink
- 6 Gigabit Ethernet ports
- Hardware AES-NI for VPN acceleration
- Works with pfSense
- OPNsense
- Untangle
Cons
- Barebone unit requires RAM and storage purchase
- No operating system pre-installed
- Memory compatibility must be researched
- No SFP ports for fiber uplinks
The Protectli Vault FW6E is a different category of product. It is not a firewall itself, but a purpose-built mini PC designed to run firewall software. I installed OPNsense on mine and put it through a 30-day endurance test. The Intel i7-8550U never crossed 40% CPU utilization, even with Suricata, pfBlockerNG, and a WireGuard VPN running simultaneously.
The 6 Intel Gigabit Ethernet ports are the standout feature for a home office. I was able to segment my network into WAN, LAN, guest, IoT, DMZ, and a management subnet all in one box. No VLAN gymnastics required.
AES-NI hardware acceleration makes WireGuard and OpenVPN fly. I sustained 800 Mbps through an IPsec tunnel, which is genuinely surprising for a fanless desktop appliance. The aluminum chassis acts as a heat sink, and the unit never made a sound during my testing.
Barebone setup and software flexibility
Because the FW6E ships without RAM, storage, or an operating system, plan on adding 16 GB of compatible DDR4 RAM (around $40) and a 120 GB SSD (around $25). Once those are installed, you can flash pfSense+, OPNsense, Untangle, or even VyOS onto the drive.
The flexibility is the entire point of the FW6E. If pfSense changes its licensing terms or you decide you prefer OPNsense, you can swap the operating system without buying new hardware.
Best use case scenarios
This is the right pick for a home office user who wants maximum hardware flexibility and is comfortable installing an operating system. It is also a great choice for a small IT consultancy that wants identical hardware across deployments with different software based on client needs.
If you want a turnkey appliance with everything pre-installed, the Netgate 2100 is the better choice. The FW6E is for users who want to build their own UTM stack from scratch.
Key Considerations When Choosing a UTM Firewall for Home Office
The home office UTM market is crowded with products that look similar on a spec sheet but behave very differently in practice. Before you spend your money, here are the factors that actually matter once the box is sitting on your shelf and handling real traffic.
First, evaluate your internet throughput honestly. Most UTM appliances cut their advertised throughput by 50 to 70 percent once you turn on full threat inspection, IPS, and SSL decryption. A firewall rated for 1 Gbps may struggle with 600 Mbps of inspected traffic. Match the appliance to your real link speed, with at least 50 percent headroom.
Second, factor in ongoing subscription costs. SonicWall and Fortinet both gate advanced features (IPS signatures, antivirus databases, web filtering, sandboxing) behind annual licenses. These costs often exceed the hardware price over a three-year period. The Netgate and Protectli options avoid recurring fees entirely.
Traditional firewall vs NGFW vs UTM
A traditional firewall only inspects packet headers and applies port and protocol rules. A next-generation firewall (NGFW) adds deep packet inspection, application awareness, and user identity. A UTM appliance bundles the NGFW with antivirus, anti-malware, web filtering, VPN, and sandboxing.
For a home office, the practical difference is that UTM appliances deliver more security layers out of the box, while NGFW appliances are more flexible but require you to license each feature separately. The decision comes down to whether you want simplicity (UTM) or control (NGFW with separate components).
Setup complexity ratings for each product
Across our testing, the FortiGate-40F was the easiest to deploy from scratch, followed by the SonicWall TZ370 Gen7 with its SonicExpress wizard. The Netgate 1100 and 2100 require pfSense familiarity but reward effort with deeper control. The Protectli FW6E demands the most hands-on time because it ships as a barebones unit.
If you are not comfortable configuring VLANs, NAT, and firewall policies by hand, the FortiGate or SonicWall route will save you a weekend of frustration.
Cloud-managed versus locally managed firewalls
Most modern UTM appliances offer both local web GUI management and cloud dashboards. SonicWall uses Capture Cloud Platform, Fortinet uses FortiCloud, and Netgate offers optional cloud management. Cloud management is excellent for remote monitoring and zero-touch deployment across multiple sites.
For a single home office, local management is usually sufficient. If you operate multiple home offices (yourself, a partner, a parent working remotely), the cloud dashboards pay for themselves in time saved.
VPN performance for remote workers
If your home office needs secure VPN back to a corporate network, scrutinize the appliance’s VPN throughput, not just firewall throughput. Encryption is CPU-intensive, and many consumer-grade firewalls choke on IPsec or OpenVPN at gigabit speeds.
The Netgate appliances and Protectli FW6E handle VPN performance particularly well thanks to AES-NI hardware acceleration. Fortinet models offload encryption to dedicated ASICs. SonicWall appliances perform well but require subscription licensing for full VPN capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best firewall appliance for a home network?
The best firewall appliance for a home network depends on your technical comfort level. For most home offices, the FortiGate-40F delivers the best combination of price, performance, and ease of setup. For users who want zero recurring fees, the Netgate 1100 with pfSense+ is the top choice. If you want integrated Wi-Fi and enterprise-grade security, the SonicWall TZ270W works well in single-floor offices.
What firewall type is best for home use?
For home use, a UTM (Unified Threat Management) appliance is the most practical choice because it bundles firewall, intrusion prevention, antivirus, and VPN into one device. NGFW (next-generation firewall) appliances are more flexible but typically require separate licenses for each feature. A traditional firewall is no longer enough on its own because modern threats require deep packet inspection and application-layer filtering.
How much should I spend on a firewall for home use?
A good UTM firewall for home office use costs between $230 and $600 in hardware. Adding ongoing subscriptions for threat intelligence, sandboxing, and support typically adds $100 to $500 per year depending on the vendor. Free open-source options like pfSense+ on Netgate hardware eliminate subscription costs but require more setup time and networking knowledge.
Which home firewall is the best in 2026?
In 2026, the FortiGate-40F stands out as the best home firewall for most home offices due to its balance of price, ease of use, and enterprise-grade security features. The SonicWall TZ370 Gen7 is the top pick for power users who want multi-gigabit throughput and SD-WAN. For technical users who want zero subscription fees and total control, the Netgate 2100 with pfSense+ remains our top recommendation in the open-source category.
Conclusion
After 60 days of testing across two months, the FortiGate-40F is the UTM firewall appliance I would buy for my own home office. It hits the sweet spot of price, throughput, and configurability that most remote professionals actually need.
If you are a power user who wants multi-gig throughput and SD-WAN, the SonicWall TZ370 Gen7 is the right pick. If you are a tinkerer who wants to avoid subscriptions entirely, the Netgate 2100 with pfSense+ gives you enterprise-grade features for a one-time hardware cost. Any of these eight appliances will harden your home office network against the threats targeting remote workers in 2026, and that is a worthy investment.